This Wisdom of the Crowd (ACC member discussion) addresses whether it is permissible to deduct additional hours of pay to employees that resulted from a payroll system glitch. This resource was compiled from questions and responses posted on the forum of the Employment & Labor Law ACC Network.*
*(Permission was received from the ACC members quoted below prior to publishing their forum Comments in this Wisdom of the Crowd resource.)
Question
Due to a payroll system glitch, a few exempt employees (located in California) received several hours of additional pay at their annualized hourly rate. Payroll seeks to deduct these additional hours of pay with the advance written consent of each employee in the next pay cycle. Is this permissible in California, recognizing that concerns with Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) pay docking restrictions?
Wisdom of the Crowd
Response # 1: With the written authorization of each employee, obtained after the overpayment happened, and specifically authorizing the company to deduct the amount of the overpayment from the next paycheck, I think this should be permitted, even in California. But, don't rely on a blanket authorization signed upon hire or otherwise not obtained specifically in reference to this situation.1
Response # 2: In California, the overpayment may only be recouped from the employee through payroll deductions if (1) the employer and employee enter into a written agreement for the specific amount of the deductions based on the voluntary consent of the employee and (2) the employee receives no less than the minimum wage for all hours worked in the pay period. Also, the deduction cannot be made from the employee's final paycheck (even with voluntary written consent).
As for whether the employee can be terminated if he or she chooses not to voluntarily pay back the money, the concern is that if the only choices are repayment or termination, the payment would no longer be voluntary. The California Labor Code also has a broad retaliation provision, which makes it unlawful to discharge an employee "because of the exercise by the employee . . . of any rights afforded him or her."
Under federal law, this would be treated as an advance on wages and can be deducted, even if it causes the employee to fall below the minimum wage.2
________________________
1Kevin G. Chapman, Associate General Counsel, Dow Jones & Company, New Jersey, (Employment & Labor Law September 8, 2016).
2Jennifer Petersen, Associate Corporate Counsel, Werner Enterprises, Inc., Nebraska (Employment & Labor Law, September 9, 2016).
Region:
United States
The information in any resource collected in this virtual library should
not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on specific facts and should not be considered representative of the views of its authors, its sponsors, and/or ACC. These resources are not intended as a definitive statement on the subject addressed. Rather, they are intended to serve as a tool providing practical advice and references for the busy in-house practitioner and other readers.