Mitchell and the subsequent Court of Appeal decisions have proven highly controversial. Described as "unduly harsh" and leading to a "climate of fear", Lord Dyson's prediction that there will be more litigation to determine the exact boundaries of the decision have been realised. Much has already been written about the aftermath. The focus of this article is to look at where we are now. How exactly have the rules of the game changed?
Members-only access
To access the full resource, you must be a
member.
Already a member?
Login to unlock.
Login
Not an ACC member?
Gain access to a comprehensive collection of global
resources for in-house counsel
Sign
up for a 30-day trial
Region:
United Kingdom
The information in any resource collected in this virtual library should
not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on specific facts and should not be considered representative of the views of its authors, its sponsors, and/or ACC. These resources are not intended as a definitive statement on the subject addressed. Rather, they are intended to serve as a tool providing practical advice and references for the busy in-house practitioner and other readers.