Sample Liability Limitation Language. Includes unlimited liability terms for the governments of Australia, Canada, and Mexico. Provisions provide for indemnification of losses. Initially published June 4, 2004; republished March 30, 2023.
This is a sample asset purchase agreement, for the sale of the seller company's business assets to the buyer company, with a choice of the laws of the state of Washington.
This is a sample litigation hold policy setting rules and procedures for a company's employees to follow to preserve evidence in connection with employment litigation matters.
This is a sample certificate of an indemnification agreement under which a company agrees to indemnify an insurance agent against certain claims.
This is a sample collection demand letter. Initially published September 21, 2015; republished March 30, 2023.
This is a sample attorney-client privilege log.
This sample agreement is intended to satisfy the covered entity’s, company’s, and vendor’s obligations under HIPAA and is incorporated into all applicable services agreements between the company and its contracted vendor.
This is a sample contract approval policy of US entities, detailing approval levels required depending on contract value, and special circumstances that require special approvals (for certain types of agreements or clauses).
This is a form trademark license agreement prepared from the perspective of a licensor looking to promote its brand and its own products by granting a license to a licensee to use the brand on its various products and promotional items.
The assignment of arbitral claims and arbitral awards is a fast-growing market practice. When entering into agreements for such assignments, it is crucial to ensure that they comply with all the applicable legal requirements. In this context, the assignee should carefully assess the risks that may arise out of the award debtor's rights pursuant to the provisions of the law applicable at the seat of arbitration and/or at the place(s) of enforcement of the award. Under French law there is a specific mechanism called the right of "retrait litigieux" ("disputed withdrawal"). In accordance with this singular legal mechanism, which is designed as a tool to fight against speculation, when a disputed claim is assigned to a third party in the course of any judicial or arbitral proceedings, the debtor is entitled to discharge its debt by paying the assignee the actual price of the assignment, plus interest and costs, instead of the full amount of the original debt (article 1699 of the French Civil Code ). As has been seen in the FG Hemisphere v Democratic Republic of the Congo saga, the conditions and requirements for exercising the right of retrait litigieux in the context of assignment of arbitral claims or arbitral awards are uncertain under French law.