Resource Library

In this multi-jurisdictional guide, explore an overview of key legal issues, rules, and developments regarding merger control across a range of jurisdictions.

This multi-jurisdictional guide explores issues in investor-state arbitration laws and regulations - including treaties, legal frameworks, case trends, funding, international tribunals, domestic courts, recognition, and enforcement.

This article examines the subpoena power of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and provides guidance for employers who receive subpoenas from these agencies. It also looks at how contractors should respond to requests for information from the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP).

This multi-jurisdictional guide explores legal issues, rules, and developments regarding sanctions.

This edition covers the economic sanctions laws of 18 jurisdictions, and its opening chapters survey key regulatory and enforcement topics.

This article discusses the unanimous US Supreme Court decision that has effectively disavowed the long-standing de minimis standard in Groff v. Dejoy, clarifying Title VII's undue hardship standard to mean "substantial increased costs in relation to the conduct of its particular business."

Learn about key implications of the Spring 2023 situation that saw the United States reach its national debt ceiling.

This Holland & Knight alert discusses what reaching the debt ceiling would potentially mean to government contractors and key considerations they should keep in mind.

If the US national debt reaches the limit set by the US Congress, a question would arise whether there is a risk that the United States might default on its obligations. With this curated selection of resources, learn about the implications in terms of disclosures for public companies, the impact on government contractors, and other issues.

This article provides an update of the sanctions enacted against Russia and Belarus by the United States, United Kingdom, and European Union.

The US Supreme Court has long been skeptical of novel proposals by federal agencies to address issues of vast economic and political significance. In West Virginia v. EPA, the Court made clear that its past cases reviewing novel applications and interpretations of agency powers do constitute an identifiable “doctrine” for application by courts going forward. When an administrative agency makes a “major policy decision,” it must have “clear congressional authorization” to do so. This case may represent one of the Supreme Court’s most significant administrative law decisions since Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council in 1984.