Login to MyACC
ACC Members

Not a Member?

The Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) is the world's largest organization serving the professional and business interests of attorneys who practice in the legal departments of corporations, associations, nonprofits and other private-sector organizations around the globe.

Join ACC


Article by: Michael Byrnes, Partner and Katrina Seck, Senior Associate, Swaab

Attend the webinar Casual Employment – New Rules of Engagement on 16th June where Michael Byrnes will explore the decision in Rossato, its potential implications, and the attempts at a legislative fix. In doing so, the risks and costs to business will be considered, along with practical mitigation strategies.

Register now

Despite the fact the major­i­ty of indus­tri­al reforms pro­posed by the Gov­ern­ment in its Fair Work Amend­ment (Sup­port­ing Australia’s Jobs and Eco­nom­ic Recov­ery) Bill 2020 (“Bill”) have been stymied by the Sen­ate employ­ers should wel­come the fact long stand­ing ambi­gu­i­ty sur­round­ing the test for deter­min­ing who a casu­al employ­ee is, and what their enti­tle­ments are, has large­ly been resolved.

The Bill, first intro­duced into Fed­er­al Par­lia­ment on 9 Decem­ber 2020, has suc­ceed­ed in cod­i­fy­ing the work­ing arrange­ments and rights of casu­al employ­ees by:

  • insert­ing a def­i­n­i­tion of casu­al employ­ment into the Fair Work Act for the first time (that draws on estab­lished com­mon law prin­ci­ples and focus­es on the nature of the offer of employment);
  • pre­vent­ing employ­ers hav­ing to pay an employ­ee twice for the same enti­tle­ment in the event an ongo­ing employ­ee is mis­clas­si­fied as casu­al, to address any poten­tial for ​‘dou­ble dipping’; 
  • pro­vid­ing the abil­i­ty for reg­u­lar casu­als to become per­ma­nent after 12 months of employ­ment pro­vid­ed that dur­ing at least the last 6 months of that peri­od the employ­ee worked a reg­u­lar pat­tern of hours on an ongo­ing basis (how­ev­er an employ­er can decide not to make an offer for casu­al con­ver­sion if there are rea­son­able grounds to do so);
  • requir­ing the Fair Work Ombuds­man to pre­pare a Casu­al Employ­ment Infor­ma­tion State­ment that con­tains infor­ma­tion about casu­al employ­ment and offers and requests for casu­al con­ver­sion; and
  • par­ties may refer dis­putes in rela­tion to the new casu­al pro­vi­sions to the Fair Work Com­mis­sion (pro­vid­ed they are not resolved by dis­cus­sions at the work­place level).

The changes in rela­tion to casu­al employ­ees rep­re­sent one of five pro­posed areas of indus­tri­al reform that had been advanced by the Gov­ern­ment. The oth­er areas, pri­mar­i­ly relat­ing to enter­prise bar­gain­ing and award flex­i­bil­i­ty, had been deeply unpop­u­lar with Labor and the unions and met with fierce resis­tance. Despite enjoy­ing bipar­ti­san sup­port, the part of the Bill that dealt with crim­i­nal­i­sa­tion of wage under­pay­ments was removed by the Government. 

The pas­sage of the Bill fol­lows con­fir­ma­tion late last year that the High Court grant­ed spe­cial leave to Work­Pac Pty Ltd to chal­lenge the Full Fed­er­al Court deci­sion in Work­Pac v Rossato [2020] FCAFC 84. In that deci­sion, the Full Fed­er­al Court found casu­als who have a firm advance com­mit­ment from their employ­er for ongo­ing work may have a claim to the same enti­tle­ments as per­ma­nent employees.

The amend­ments to the Fair Work Act are an oppor­tu­ni­ty for employ­ers to reflect on how their casu­al employ­ees are engaged and, in par­tic­u­lar, whether there is con­sis­ten­cy with the new def­i­n­i­tion of casu­al employ­ee found in the Bill.


This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work properly; others help us improve the user experience.

By using the site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. For more information, read our cookies policy and our privacy policy.