Preventing Discrimination and Harassment In The Workplace
Authored by Eric Quinn, Association of Corporate Counsel
Charges of workplace discrimination and harassment can produce costly litigation and/or large settlements. As in-house counsel, mitigating this risk is a top priority. Taking into consideration the applicable statutes and case law, a properly formed anti-discrimination and harassment policy can severely limit an employer’s liability. Below are some guidelines for achieving that goal.
Federal law prohibits workplace discrimination based on a wide range of characteristics, from the well known (age, disability, race, sex), to the lesser known (genetic information, pregnancy, citizenship). There are five core laws to stay familiar with:
Also of importance is the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009—applying to all protected categories under Title VII, the ADEA, the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act—which states that an individual subjected to pay discrimination may file a charge within 180 days of any of the following:
Many states and localities have enacted laws protecting additional characteristics from on-the-job discrimination and harassment. These include: sexual orientation, marital status, military status, creed, genetic predisposition or carrier status, familial status, physical appearance, educational status, ancestry, and handicap or family responsibilities.
While sexual harassment in the workplace is not a recent problem, legal liability for it is. In 1991 Congress amended Title VII to permit victims of sexual harassment to recover damages under federal law, and the U.S. Supreme Court broadened the reach of this law in a 1993 case to allow for a lesser showing of injury. As a result, sexual harassment in the workplace presents a clear and present danger to businesses. Organizations must act now or face increasing risk of liability.
Sexual harassment is defined as “unwelcome verbal, visual, or physical conduct of a sexual nature that is severe or pervasive and affects working conditions or creates a hostile work environment.” Title VII recognizes two different sets of legal grounds for sexual harassment claims:
Under Title VII, covered employers must: 1) take reasonable care to prevent sexual harassment, and 2) take reasonable care to promptly correct sexual harassment that has occurred. It should be noted that not all conduct of a sexual nature is proscribed, only unwelcome conduct. Consensual relationships are not a violation and social invitations from supervisors and co-workers are generally acceptable.
As a general rule, the actions of supervisory employees are considered actions of the employer. Thus, if a supervisor engages in discrimination, harassment or retaliation, the organization can be held “strictly liable” for those actions should they culminate in a tangible employment action—that is, a significant change in the victim’s employment status—such as discharge, demotion, reassignment, or a significant change in benefits. When harassment by a supervisor does not result in a tangible employment action the employer can raise an affirmative defense to liability in which it must prove that:
In particular, companies need to train their supervisors to deal with discrimination and harassment claims. All responses by a supervisor are considered the organization’s response.
Furthermore, an employer can be liable for discrimination or harassment by a co-worker, non-supervisory employee, or third party if: 1) no reasonable avenue for complaint is provided, or 2) the employer knew (or should have known) of the unlawful conduct but unreasonably failed to stop it.
The Racial Equality Directive 2000/43/EC implemented the principle of equal treatment between people irrespective of racial or ethnic origin. The directive contains definitions of direct and indirect discrimination and harassment and allows for positive action measures to be taken, in order to ensure full equality in practice.
Likewise, the Employment Equality Directive 2000/78/EC calls for equal treatment in the workplace irrespective of religion, disability, age, or sexual orientation (gender discrimination and harassment proscribed by 2006/54/EC). It includes identical provisions to the Racial Equality Directive on definitions of discrimination and harassment.
In an effort to simplify its complicated and vast array of anti-discrimination laws, the UK passed the Equality Act 2010. The Act prohibits employer discrimination and harassment on the basis of gender, race, disability, sexual orientation, religious belief and age. Harassment in the UK is defined as unwanted conduct with the purpose or effect of violating the dignity of a person and of creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment.
The Canadian Human Rights Act—covering federal government departments, agencies and Crown corporations, as well as business and industries under federal jurisdiction—proscribes discrimination and harassment in the workplace on 11 grounds: race, color, national or ethnic origin, age, religion, sex, marital status, family status, disability, pardoned conviction, and sexual orientation. In addition to federal law, all provinces and territories have their own legislation, which prohibits discrimination within their respective jurisdiction.
International employers should familiarize themselves with the intricacies of international labor law while keeping in mind the guidelines for formulating a comprehensive discrimination and harassment policy.
The Supreme Court (Ellerth and Faragher) and the EEOC have suggested employers "take all steps necessary to prevent sexual harassment from occurring, such as affirmatively raising the subject, expressing strong disapproval, developing appropriate sanctions, informing employees of their right to raise, and how to raise, the issue of harassment under Title VII, and developing methods to sensitize all concerned." First, develop a comprehensive, detailed written policy on sexual harassment. Second, distribute the policy to all workers, supervisors, and even some non-employees. At a minimum, a policy should include:
As indicated by the federal courts, an employer greatly improves its position by having grievance procedures that encourage employees to come forward with complaints. It is crucial that a victim not be required to address complaints to a supervisor who is involved, condones, or ignores the harassment.
Because women lodge the majority of sexual harassment complaints, companies may want to consider involving a female employee in their assessment of a claim. That way, female victims may be more willing to come forward, thus enhancing an employer's ability to take prompt and effective remedial action.
Upon receipt of a complaint, a prompt and thorough investigation should be made and corrective action taken if any policies were violated. The complaint should be kept confidential to the extent possible and the victim must be protected from retaliation.
Any type of backlash to a discrimination or harassment claim is also against the law. Retaliation can take many forms, but often involves reassigning an employee to a less desirable position or forcing a victim to take a leave of absence. A proper discrimination and harassment policy should safeguard the rights of the accuser, as well as those of the accused, until a thorough investigation can be performed. However, a policy should also provide for sanctions in the event of a frivolous or bad faith claim.
Have an idea for a quick counsel or interested in writing one?
Reprinted with permission from the Association of Corporate Counsel
2010 All Rights Reserved
Additional ACC Resources
Oct 2013 InfoPAK
This InfoPAK provides an overview of the administrative process and the necessary steps the employer must take to properly ...
Jan 2014 Article
The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act recently came into force in India. ...
Jun 2012 Quick Reference
Guidance on how in-house counsel can best handle sexual harassment in the workplace and wage hour issues. Includes an analysis ...
Jan 2011 Form & Policy
Sample letter to EEOC regarding claim by employee that he/she was the target of discrimination.
Jan 2014 Form & Policy
A sample letter responding to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for charges of discrimination.
Jan 2014 ACC Docket
It is no longer enough for a business to show that it has adopted policies against discrimination and retaliation, and that ...
Jul 2011 ACC Docket
Read this 2012 Communicator Award-winning and Apex Award-winning articleMost people cannot begin to imagine the constant ...
Apr 2011 QuickCounsel
This QuickCounsel provides an overview of systemic discrimination EEOC investigations, a comparison to pattern-or-practice ...
Apr 2011 Top Ten
Because employment law can be a minefield of overlapping laws and regulations, this Top Ten discusses basic issues for the ...
Jul 2012 Article
A review of employment law in Brazil. Includes review of labor laws, hiring and firing regulations, and employee relationships.
Need Assistance ?Contact ACC