QuickCounsel

Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR")

Summary

Alternative Dispute Resolution (also known as External Dispute Resolution in some countries) includes dispute resolution processes and techniques that fall outside of the governmental judicial process. Although ADR varies by country and culture, this QuickCounsel shall focus on the common elements.

Back to top

Benefits

ADR often reduces costs (versus litigation), is expeditious, in full compliance with due process protocols and allows for greater control over the selection of the individual(s) who will decide the dispute.

Back to top

Arenas

Three historic arenas exist: (1) outside of the official judicial mechanisms, (2) informal methods attached to or pendant to official judicial mechanisms, and (3) independent methods outlined with a particular program or entity.

Back to top

Types

Negotiation: participation is voluntary; parties alone facilitate the resolution process or impose a resolution.

Mediation (non-binding): a third party mediator facilitates the resolution process but does not impose a resolution on the parties. In some countries (for example, the UK), ADR is synonymous with what is generally referred to as mediation in other countries.

Collaborative Law: each party has an attorney who facilitates the resolution process within specifically contracted terms. The parties reach agreement but no one imposes a resolution on the parties. It is a formalized process that is part of the court system.

Arbitration (binding): a third party, as a private judge, imposes a resolution.

*Note: Online ADR, known as Online Dispute Resolution ("ODR"), can be provided by government entities and on a global scale (e.g., in the case of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy “UDRP” and domain name disputes). Since it is provided by government entities, ODR does not technically satisfy the “alternative” element of ADR.

Back to top

Statutes

International

• Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral, Awards 330 U.N.T.S. 38 (1959)
• Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration, O.A.S.T.S. No. 42, 14 I.L.M. 336 (1975)

U.S. Federal Statutes

• Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq
• 1998 Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act
• Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996, 5 USCA s 571 R 3 OF 16 USC 5 U.S.C.A. s 571
• Uniform Arbitration Act

State

• State ADR statutes

Back to top

Sample Clauses

The clause may also include references to applicable arbitration rules and stipulations and must be tailored to ensure enforceability in the applicable jurisdiction.

Mediation Clause: To the extent that a claim or dispute arises out of, or in relation to, the terms, construction, interpretation, performance, termination, breach, or enforceability of this contract, the parties hereby agree that they shall attempt to settle the claim or dispute through mediation. The parties agree that they shall mutually select a qualified mediator from the panel offered by [Insert ADR Entity] and the rules of [Insert ADR Entity Rules & Regulations]. The parties further agree that the costs of the mediation shall be divided equally between them.

Arbitration Clause: To the extent that a claim or dispute arises out of, or in relation to, the terms, construction, interpretation, performance, termination, breach, or enforceability of this contract, the parties hereby agree that the claim or dispute shall be settled by binding arbitration. The parties agree that they shall mutually select an arbitrator, or a panel of three arbitrators, from the group of individuals offered by [Insert ADR Entity] and the rules of [Insert ADR Entity Rules & Regulations]. The arbitrator(s) shall base the award on applicable law, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The parties further agree that the costs of the arbitration shall be divided equally between them.

The two clauses above also may be combined to create a two-step, hybrid approach to resolving disputes.

* Note: In recent years, the enforceability of arbitration clauses, particularly in the context of consumer agreements (e.g., credit card agreements), has drawn scrutiny from courts. Although parties may appeal arbitration outcomes to courts, such appeals face an exacting standard of review.

Back to top

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

Standard/Sample Clauses

Study

ACC Resources

Back to top

About the Author

Ellen M. Zavian is a AAA certified arbitrator and conducts high profile arbitration cases in the Sports and Entertainment industry.

Have an idea for a quickcounsel or interested in writing one?

• Email ACC at quickcounsel@acc.com or call +1 202.293.4103 ex341 with your ideas and inquiries.

Back to top