• Login· Join/Renew
  • Legal Resources
  • Education
  • Community
  • About ACC
  • Careers
  • ACC Value Challenge
  • ACC Docket
  • Chapters
  • Committees
  • Advocacy

Legal Resources

QuickCounsel

Independent Contractor Versus Employee Status: A Global Perspective

Authored by Nichole Opkins, Esq., for the Association of Corporate Counsel

Overview
United States
Europe
   European Union    
   United Kingdom
   France
   Germany
Canada
Conclusion
Government Resources

Rate this QuickCounsel

OVERVIEW

This QuickCounsel covers the general features of an independent contractor relationship and it's differences from that of a full-time employee position. The question of difference between an independent contractor and an employee turns on local law in the place the service provider works. (Choice-of-foreign-law clauses in contractor agreements rarely control, because public policy of fundamental employee protection is at stake.) Every country's local law offers up some list of factors distinguishing contractors from employees. Generally, countries' lists of factors are surprisingly similar, from nation to nation. This is one of very few areas in international employment law where broad generalizations across jurisdictions can be useful. Most all countries uphold independent contractor status if the service provider can truthfully answer "yes" to five questions:

  • Do you have "authoritative control" to do your work the way you want to — free from instruction on process, free from discipline, free from work rules, free from your principal's "supervision and control"?
  • Are you free to set your own schedule and hours?
  • Do you provide your own office and supplies, pay your own business expenses, and hire your own assistants?
  • Do you get paid only for work done, such as hourly/task pay (no paid vacations/holidays)?
  • Can you, and do you, have other paying clients — and do you market your services to the public?

To be considered an independent contractor, generally a person has independence to perform work and is not subordinate to a company's directives and regulations, and there is no exclusivity in the relationship between the parties.

It is a good idea to keep the line between an employee and a contractor very clear, which is best done through an explicit independent contractor agreement.  A contractor's agreement to perform services should clearly state the type of relationship that exists and should outline the terms of service and specific deliverables.  It should not specify any control over the method in which the work is performed.  The company should not direct how the work is done, through instructions, training, or control over how the contractor spends money earned by the contract, or any other means.  Clarifying the relationship in a contract benefits both the company and the contractor by preventing tax issues from arising that could put both parties at risk of being investigated.

Back to top

UNITED STATES

Due to the current economic climate, the United States has seen an uptick in hiring of independent contractors. This benefits companies by allowing them to pay for just the end-product or work they need done while avoiding administering workers compensation claims or paying payroll taxes, workers compensation premiums, or unemployment insurance, required by the Fair Labor Standards Act for employees.

According to the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the general rule for determining employment versus independent contractor status is that an individual is considered an independent contractor if the persons for whom the services are performed have the right to control or direct only the result of the work, and not the means and methods of accomplishing the result.  Below is a list of typical characteristics of an independent contractor relationship, based upon an IRS publication:

  • No instructions
  • No training
  • Services do not have to be rendered personally
  • Set own work hours
  • Not a continuing relationship
  • Control their assistants
  • No interim reports
  • Paid by job
  • Time to pursue other work
  • Decide on job location
  • Order of work set
  • Work for multiple companies
  • Pay business expenses
  • Have own tools or equipment
  • Significant investment in their business
  • Offer services to general public
  • Can make entrepreneurial profit or loss
  • Cannot be fired at will
  • No compensation for non-completion

In general, an employee, as distinguished from an independent contractor who is engaged in a business of his own, is one who "follows the usual path of an employee" and is dependent on the business that he serves. The Supreme Court has said that there is no definition under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) that resolves all questions of whether an employment relationship exists. FLSA considers independent contractors to be 'self-employed' under its regulation and does not state specific terms for independent contractors, but rather, terms for what makes a person eligible for benefits as an employee. Thus, if a person does not meet these terms, by inference he could be considered an independent contractor, but a clear definition of an independent contractor is not given. The Court has also said that determination of the relationship cannot be based on isolated factors or upon a single characteristic, but depends upon the circumstances of the whole activity. The goal of the analysis is to determine the underlying economic reality of the situation and whether the individual is economically dependent on the supposed employer. The factors that the U.S. Supreme Court has considered significant, although no single one is regarded as controlling, can be found here.

Besides the IRS, other government agencies have a stake in a worker's classification. The United States Department of Labor, National Labor Relations Board, and state level tax and unemployment compensation insurance agencies are just some agencies that are interested in the relationship between a company and an independent contractor.  This interest lies in ensuring that fair labor practices are in place, including the avoidance of unlawful termination, benefits, and insurance rights. It is always important to properly classify your worker, whether an employee or an independent contractor, to avoid a time-consuming governmental investigation.

Back to top


EUROPE

European Union

The European Commission, the governing body of the European Union, outlines the responsibilities of employers in the 27 member states of the EU. The EC covers free movement of workers, a core EU principle, which allows every EU national to work in any other EU country without a work permit. This helps employers find staff with the right profile, especially if candidates in their home country are in short supply. Employers have to apply the same rules to workers from other EU countries - e.g., access to employment, working conditions including salary and paid annual leave, and dismissal - as they do for national staff. They may not impose any additional conditions. In terms of specific rules on independent contractors, the individual countries are responsible for creating the standards by which an independent contractor is judged. From that, it can be determined what roll an independent contractor will take when entering into an employment situation with a company. Although the free movement of workers is acceptable and encouraged in the EU, the rules by which contractors versus employees are judged still remains within the individual country's control. 

Back to top


United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom specifically, if the worker is not an employee, he may be an independent contractor and the contract between him and the employer will be a contract for services. The principle of "at will" employment does not exist in the UK and employees have a number of statutory protections. They cannot be dismissed except for just cause such as redundancy, misconduct or incapability, and then only if certain stringent procedures are followed and appropriate notice is given.  By contrast, an independent contractor's job receives much less protection than that of an employee in the UK, since such stringent constraints are placed on the dismissal of an employee.  Another key distinction between employees and independent contractors in the UK is that an independent contractor is taxed differently than an employee, and is responsible for making those payments himself.

Back to top


France

The Labour Code (Code du Travail) is the primary basis for labor law in France. Most employment contracts are for an open term and a major legal distinction exists between top managers and lower grade staff. Many specific employment contract types are required when working in France.  There are a set number of contract types that cover different types of employment in France, such as open-ended contracts, fixed-term employment, apprenticeship contracts, and intermittent contracts, to name a few; France is well known for a large public sector with heavy and rigid bureaucratic administration.

However, in recent years, the country has encouraged self-employment and the creation of new business. It is sometimes easier for a worker from outside of the country to become self-employed (i.e., work as an independent contractor) than to gain a work visa in France.  Those who would consider the use of an independent contractor agreement are referred to as 'freelancers' in France; these are consultants, translators, accountants, doctors, lawyers, architects, artists, who are likely to work without employees. To be self-employed in France, you must also receive permission and show the seriousness of your intent and your ability to generate revenue in the country.

Back to top

Germany

As with France, Germany has very serious tax rules that affect the self-employed person. Failure to properly show that the contractor is not an employee may lead to the client being liable for social security contributions.  This is considered 'disguised employment'; this is more likely to occur the less skilled the individual is and the longer the individual supplies his services to one client at one site. For contractors in Germany, tax liability is from commencement of contract, and social security registration is not compulsory. If an issue arises, the contractor could apply in writing at the social security authorities, Deutsche Rentenversicherung, to decide the status of the contractor as self-employed or employee.

Back to top


Canada

The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) uses a four-point test to determine the relationship status between an individual and a company.  The CRA regulation, "Employee or Self-Employed?" (RC4110)  defines the distinction between employee and independent contractor and "sets out a method that should, in most cases, allow payers and workers to determine the nature of their relationship." The four points relate to: (1) control, (2) ownership of tools, (3) chance of profit/risk of loss, and (4) integration.  If the relationship clearly shows that the individual has control over the manner in which the work is performed, he does so with the use of his own tools (this may mean machinery, however, this also covers office supplies, office space, and personal technology), is in control over the profits or risk of not obtaining such profits, and is not integrated into the daily workings and responsibilities that come with working as an employee, then he would be an independent contractor.  An independent contractor agreement in Canada should, therefore, contain clear clauses on the contractor's right to maintain where, when and how the work will be done. This will be helpful documentation should the CRA inquire into the business relationship.

Back to top

CONCLUSION

Maintaining the proper classification of employees versus contractors is very important to ensure compliance with labor law regulations.  Execute an independent contractor agreement, and include proper documentation in the agreement that clearly states that a contractor is independent from the company, is self-employed, and will be responsible for final deliverables, not the method in which they are produced.  The rules are unique to each country, and Human Resource professionals are urged to review the specific requirements for each country as needed.

Back to top

GOVERNMENT RESOURCES

  • IRS Guidance on Classification of Workers (United States)
  • DOL Guidance on the Proper Classification of Workers as Independent Contractors or Employees (United States)
  • NATLEX (Europe)
  • European Commission:  Enterprise Europe Network (European Union)
  • European Commission: Your Europe (Specifics of employment in the 27 countries of the EU) (European Union)
  • Canada Revenue Agency (Canada)
  • Overseas Independent Contractor — Action Steps and Checklist   
  • The Importance of Correctly Classifying Independent Contractors
  • Forming Relationships with Independent Contractors

Back to top






Have an idea for a quickcounsel or interested in writing one?

  • Submit your ideas by filling out our online topic proposal form.
The information in this QuickCounsel should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on specific facts and should not be considered representative of the views of its authors, its sponsors, and/or the ACC. This QuickCounsel is not intended as a definitive statement on the subject addressed. Rather, it is intended to serve as a tool providing practical advice and references for the busy in-house practitioner and other readers.

Back to top

Reprinted with permission from the Association of Corporate Counsel
2013 All Rights Reserved

Download PDF

Login to rate this document

Download PDF

 

Share  

Additional ACC Resources

Top Ten Reasons to Use Independent Contractors Rather Than Employees

May 2011 Top Ten

Ten good reasons to consider hiring an independent contractor rather than a full-time employee.

Preserving Independent Contractor Status in an Increasingly Hostile Environment

Apr 2011 ACC Docket

Whats the difference between an employee and an independent contractor? Answer incorrectly and prepare for the consequences ...

Wage and Hour Update: Legal Developments and Emerging Trends in Wage and Hour Collective Actions

Oct 2010 Article

An extensive paper written by the presenters of Session 606 of the ACC 2010 Annual Meeting concerning the trends in wage ...

Top Ten Action Steps to Take if You Have an Independent Contractor Compliance Issue

Jul 2011 Top Ten

Once you know you have independent contractor (IC) risk, what should you do about it? These ten best practices can mitigating ...

France: Extension of Protective Measures in French Bankruptcy Proceedings

Jun 2012 QuickCounsel

This QuickCounsel focuses on the recent amendment to the French bankruptcy law No. 2012-346 relating to protective measures ...

State Drug Testing Laws

Aug 2012 Form & Policy

This sample provides a comprehensive multistate guide regarding state drug testing laws and regulations.

Buyer Due Diligence and Risk Mitigation in Government Contractor M&A Transactions: How In-House Counsel Can Make or Break a Transaction Right Out of the Box

Sep 2011 InfoPAK

In recent years, mergers and acquisitions have become increasingly important to the growth strategies of Government Contractors ...

Affirmative Action Compliance

Sep 2011 InfoPAK

The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) is the U.S. Department of Labor agency charged with enforcing ...

Government Schedule Contracting

Jul 2012 InfoPAK

This InfoPAK provides explanations and practical tips regarding the Federal Governments most widely used contract vehicle. ...

Sample Due Diligence Checklist for M&A Transactions

Sep 2011 Form & Policy

Basic checklist of materials and considerations necessary in a merger and acquisition.



Questions?

Contact legalresources@acc.com
phone:+1.202.293.4103, x456

Browse ACC Resources By
Practice Area
  • Commercial
  • Compliance & Ethics
  • Corporate, Securities & Governance
  • Employment & Labor
  • Energy/Public Utility
  • Environmental
  • Financial Services
  • Government
  • Insurance
  • Intellectual Property
  • International
  • Law Department Management
  • Litigation
  • Media/Publishing
  • Real Estate
  • Technology
Region
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Australia/Pacific
  • Caribbean/Central America
  • Europe
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • South America
Resource Type
  • Amicus Briefs
  • Forms & Policies
  • Online Education
  • Policy Statements
  • Practice Examples
  • Presentations
  • Primers
  • Publications
  • Quick References
  • Surveys




  • Home
  • Legal
  • About ACC
  • FAQs
  • Advertising & Sponsorships
  • Site Map
  • Contact Us

©Copyright 1998–2013 All rights reserved.     Reprint Request